-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 124
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
make process_output be able to return keep_alive timeout #2136
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM.
So all the test changes revert what was done in #1491?
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #2136 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 95.35% 95.35% -0.01%
==========================================
Files 112 112
Lines 36336 36357 +21
==========================================
+ Hits 34648 34668 +20
- Misses 1688 1689 +1 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
Failed Interop TestsQUIC Interop Runner, client vs. server neqo-latest as client
neqo-latest as server
All resultsSucceeded Interop TestsQUIC Interop Runner, client vs. server neqo-latest as client
neqo-latest as server
Unsupported Interop TestsQUIC Interop Runner, client vs. server neqo-latest as client
neqo-latest as server
|
Benchmark resultsPerformance differences relative to 824d7c4. coalesce_acked_from_zero 1+1 entries: No change in performance detected.time: [99.061 ns 99.675 ns 100.48 ns] change: [-6.8172% -2.3726% +0.2961%] (p = 0.32 > 0.05) coalesce_acked_from_zero 3+1 entries: Change within noise threshold.time: [116.63 ns 116.91 ns 117.21 ns] change: [-1.1534% -0.7157% -0.2621%] (p = 0.00 < 0.05) coalesce_acked_from_zero 10+1 entries: No change in performance detected.time: [116.23 ns 116.72 ns 117.31 ns] change: [-1.2371% -0.6152% +0.1547%] (p = 0.07 > 0.05) coalesce_acked_from_zero 1000+1 entries: No change in performance detected.time: [97.216 ns 97.363 ns 97.523 ns] change: [-1.7227% -0.7616% +0.0880%] (p = 0.11 > 0.05) RxStreamOrderer::inbound_frame(): No change in performance detected.time: [111.19 ms 111.25 ms 111.31 ms] change: [-0.0708% +0.1425% +0.2870%] (p = 0.13 > 0.05) transfer/pacing-false/varying-seeds: Change within noise threshold.time: [27.424 ms 28.656 ms 29.894 ms] change: [+1.0141% +6.7524% +13.208%] (p = 0.03 < 0.05) transfer/pacing-true/varying-seeds: Change within noise threshold.time: [37.013 ms 38.881 ms 40.743 ms] change: [+2.0478% +8.5685% +15.609%] (p = 0.02 < 0.05) transfer/pacing-false/same-seed: No change in performance detected.time: [26.530 ms 27.429 ms 28.352 ms] change: [-1.2476% +3.3788% +8.1859%] (p = 0.15 > 0.05) transfer/pacing-true/same-seed: Change within noise threshold.time: [44.293 ms 46.734 ms 49.212 ms] change: [+1.2376% +8.6392% +16.890%] (p = 0.03 < 0.05) 1-conn/1-100mb-resp (aka. Download)/client: Change within noise threshold.time: [112.42 ms 112.83 ms 113.22 ms] thrpt: [883.27 MiB/s 886.30 MiB/s 889.53 MiB/s] change: time: [-1.9247% -1.3603% -0.8195%] (p = 0.00 < 0.05) thrpt: [+0.8263% +1.3791% +1.9625%] 1-conn/10_000-parallel-1b-resp (aka. RPS)/client: No change in performance detected.time: [310.11 ms 313.92 ms 317.71 ms] thrpt: [31.475 Kelem/s 31.856 Kelem/s 32.246 Kelem/s] change: time: [-2.6371% -0.9932% +0.6941%] (p = 0.24 > 0.05) thrpt: [-0.6893% +1.0031% +2.7086%] 1-conn/1-1b-resp (aka. HPS)/client: No change in performance detected.time: [33.838 ms 34.050 ms 34.281 ms] thrpt: [29.170 elem/s 29.368 elem/s 29.552 elem/s] change: time: [-1.4553% -0.6774% +0.2187%] (p = 0.11 > 0.05) thrpt: [-0.2182% +0.6821% +1.4768%] Client/server transfer resultsTransfer of 33554432 bytes over loopback.
|
Yes, correct. |
0aa9c54
to
f0fe2d2
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thank you for bearing with me.
Once this is merged, I can cut a new release of Neqo and uplift it to mozilla-central.
Merging |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I forgot to comment...
6e1f4c0
to
b5b887d
Compare
Fix #2087