We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
This is a follow-up issue for the #228 and #227.
We now have SQL functions implemented in two places:
func
functions
We need to update the code to use new func module only.
@dmpetrov:
Yes, it should be imported from top level: from datachain.func import min, concat
from datachain.func import min, concat
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
another requirement: we should never expose keywords like sql and sqlalchemy. it introduces quite a bit of confusion.
Users should be able implementing theirs scenario without touching these keywords and libs.
Sorry, something went wrong.
dreadatour
Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.
This is a follow-up issue for the #228 and #227.
We now have SQL functions implemented in two places:
func
module: https://github.com/iterative/datachain/tree/main/src/datachain/lib/func with support of types and signal columnsfunctions
module: https://github.com/iterative/datachain/tree/main/src/datachain/sql/functions with raw sqlalchemy functionsWe need to update the code to use new
func
module only.@dmpetrov:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: