Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Use isatty() when using GNU libc #2922

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 19, 2024
Merged

Conversation

pinotree
Copy link
Contributor

Description

While isatty() is a POSIX interface and theoretically could be used more broadly than on Linux and macOS, use a conservative approach and use it on any platform that uses GNU libc.

This fixes #1670 regression check on GNU/Hurd (which uses GNU libc).

While isatty() is a POSIX interface and theoretically could be used
more broadly than on Linux and macOS, use a conservative approach and
use it on any platform that uses GNU libc.
Copy link

codecov bot commented Oct 18, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 90.99%. Comparing base (0b2af56) to head (5851a09).
Report is 1 commits behind head on devel.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##            devel    #2922   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   90.99%   90.99%           
=======================================
  Files         198      198           
  Lines        8597     8597           
=======================================
  Hits         7822     7822           
  Misses        775      775           

@horenmar
Copy link
Member

Thanks

@horenmar horenmar merged commit a6ee7e2 into catchorg:devel Oct 19, 2024
77 checks passed
@horenmar horenmar added the Tweak label Oct 19, 2024
@pinotree pinotree deleted the isatty-glibc branch October 19, 2024 19:20
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants