You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
We should document the intended behavior for ordering dimensions and test that the shape is consistent. I would have expected that the original dimension would be retained, in contrast to the most common behavior of the batch generator. @jhamman can you provide insight into the original intended behavior?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I will treat the edge case in which the output dimension order does not agree with the order specified by input_dims as a bug and submit a fix.
@maxrjones, i've hit a roadblock while trying to come up with a patch for this issue and would love your input if you ever made any progress on this issue in the past :)
What is your issue?
In most cases, the batch generator will permute the dimension order to agree with the order specified in
input_dims
. Here is an example:In at least one case, the original dimension order is retained:
We should document the intended behavior for ordering dimensions and test that the shape is consistent. I would have expected that the original dimension would be retained, in contrast to the most common behavior of the batch generator. @jhamman can you provide insight into the original intended behavior?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: