You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I think the user should receive a warning when the given data set can not cover the target grid. So it is better to have an extra check here. Currently, if that is the case, the regridder still works, but user will get a field with only 0 outside of the area covered by the original data.
BSchilperoort
changed the title
(most_common) User should receive a warning when the given data set can not cover the target grid.
User should receive a warning when the given data set can not cover the target grid.
Feb 8, 2024
Additionally, we should check if the new resolution is finer than the old one. In that case an error should be raised instructing the user to use something like nearest-neighbor
I think the user should receive a warning when the given data set can not cover the target grid. So it is better to have an extra check here. Currently, if that is the case, the regridder still works, but user will get a field with only 0 outside of the area covered by the original data.
Originally posted by @geek-yang in #12 (comment)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: