You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
The trouble is that we currently assume that if op$= (W|w)$ has nonzero part $w$ and is in a primitive setting, then it is necessarily a nonsymmorphic operation: but that is not true in general. Rather, $w$ could simply indicate where the rotation axis/mirror plane is.
Now, for a proper nonsymmorphic operation, if we apply it n times (with n denoting rotation order), it must become a pure, nonzero translation - but here, instead, we have:
The trouble is that we currently assume that if$= (W|w)$ has nonzero part $w$ and is in a primitive setting, then it is necessarily a nonsymmorphic operation: but that is not true in general. Rather, $w$ could simply indicate where the rotation axis/mirror plane is.
op
As an example, in SG 120, we have:
Now, for a proper nonsymmorphic operation, if we apply it
n
times (withn
denoting rotation order), it must become a pure, nonzero translation - but here, instead, we have:What we probably need to do is compute the intrinsic translation part of$w_g = w - w_l$ . See e.g., Section 11.2.
w
, what ITA callsThe text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: