Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

🤔 PRs not reviewed/responded #1552

Open
JFWooten4 opened this issue Sep 12, 2024 · 1 comment
Open

🤔 PRs not reviewed/responded #1552

JFWooten4 opened this issue Sep 12, 2024 · 1 comment
Labels

Comments

@JFWooten4
Copy link
Contributor

JFWooten4 commented Sep 12, 2024

In re stylizing READMEs, I appreciate that many on the extremely talented core dev team face mammoth daily tasks. Might someone reply to any of the three outstanding diction clarifications documented?1

Syntax changes have been approved in the past, and I don't see material differences from these and mine. 💬

With everything in software, there's a first iteration. Then people improve upon it—make better and better versions.
Jed McCaleb

Previous clarifications of mine have quickly been approved because they referred to existing issues. ✅ If I am to extrapolate from this behavior and other stale changes, might I ask if all PRs must solve an issue?2

Motivation

By making the community documentation easier to read on GitHub, do you think we can foster more scrutiny over the protocol?3 Namely, might more eyeballs on the code mean further public understanding and potential bug bounty saves? It's my view that decentralizing this vital information empowers the next generation of contributors to further our great mission. 🌌

Footnotes

  1. See also feedback from documentation repo, productive public improvement dialogue, and accurate amendments duly conversed.

  2. On this note, I greatly support the recent move from Google Groups to GitHub Discussions for new community upgrades. 💙 As many members have showcased, Discussions add a plethora of formatting benefits, social involvement, and streamlined references that are a step-function advancement for quick, referenceable, and accountable conversations.

  3. It is my present understanding that more developers on the network will also help us best achieve a universal global payment system that works entirely for the people it serves.

Copy link

This issue is stale because it has been open for 30 days with no activity. It will be closed in 30 days unless the stale label is removed.

@github-actions github-actions bot added the stale label Oct 24, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants
@JFWooten4 and others