Free software license?

[nileshpatra]

Hi,
We have this project as a package in Debian currently
Whilst I agree that every file containing "code" has a BSD license on top of it, but due to the absence of a LICENSE file, the data and documentation becomes non-free according to the free software guideline followed here.
Could you please add in the same in a LICENSE file and commit?
That'd be great.

PS: Considering that PAML has also adopted a free software license, this can also go about doing the same w/o conflicts, I suppose.

[nileshpatra]

Hi,
We have this project as a package in Debian currently
Whilst I agree that every file containing "code" has a BSD license on top of it, but due to the absence of a LICENSE file, the data and documentation becomes non-free according to the free software guideline followed here.
Could you please add in the same in a LICENSE file and commit?
That'd be great.

PS: Considering that PAML has also adopted a free software license, this can also go about doing the same w/o conflicts, I suppose.

@rambaut could you please do the needful? :)

[tillea]

Hi,
any news about this? It would be really helpful if there would be a clarification of the license.
Kind regards, Andreas.