-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 150
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Remove this repo, and migrate to chain:address
format
#221
Comments
Maybe should be a RFC? |
We still need a registry somewhere that gives the prefix for each consensus system, but then we would really just have three: Polkadot, Kusama, and testnets. So perhaps a repo/registry is overkill and we just go to using chain specs? In which case, I think @bkchr is right, we should have an RFC telling UI/app devs to use the prefix of the consensus system to which it belongs. Or, both are right :). Delete the repo and have an RFC with recommendations on what should be done instead. |
I mean I'm not against removing/moving this repo to somewhere else. :) |
Couldn't that live on-chain on the consensus system? Just query Kusama if you want to know the prefix. This whole registry was about making sure that everyone could "claim their prefix", which is no longer a pattern we want to encourage given the consensus based format. |
Yes, it does, but that doesn't mean people look for it there or use it. I would say archive this repo, but we should also not just make it disappear but rather provide instructions about what to do instead of using it. |
Context: https://forum.polkadot.network/t/ux-proposal-consensus-based-address-formats/6072
Accepted Solutions:
cc @joepetrowski
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: