You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
However, the current implementation does not follow this format, and instead uses 3 component version like in this case:
"MessageId": "Base.1.19.0.QueryParameterOutOfRange".
Before actually starting to do anything on this front, I want to learn whether it was a deliberate decision, and what would be the blast radius of changing this to comply with the spec (i.e. removing the 3rd part of the version).
Is this the right place to submit this?
Bug Description
Hello,
The "9.5.11.2 MessageId format" section of the spec (https://www.dmtf.org/sites/default/files/standards/documents/DSP0266_1.21.0.pdf) describes message id format as:
"..."
However, the current implementation does not follow this format, and instead uses 3 component version like in this case:
"MessageId": "Base.1.19.0.QueryParameterOutOfRange".
My understanding is, the version comes from the registry version (https://github.com/openbmc/bmcweb/blob/master/scripts/parse_registries.py#L247) as it is, without converting format.
Before actually starting to do anything on this front, I want to learn whether it was a deliberate decision, and what would be the blast radius of changing this to comply with the spec (i.e. removing the 3rd part of the version).
Version
Additional Information
No response
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: