-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2.7k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
tv_weight = 0
=> attempt to index upvalue 'module' (a nil value)
#205
Comments
This may not help in your case, but I would not use adam with nin-imagenet as my first choice. Nin-imagenet appears more difficult to get to converge and l-bfgs is definitely better in that. |
I am downloading the VGG 19 layers one now, I just wondered if that's a sign that something else on my system is not ok(or a bug) |
You can use l-bfgs with nin-imagenet, just leave out -optimizer adam. But there is probably something wrong in your setup. Running the same I get the following. Are you sure you have the correct model? Md5sum gives 8fbacb8dd696607876386e34ff68a84a models/nin_imagenet_conv.caffemodel
|
I guess so, but the error persists.
|
Nin-imagenet-conv may be a bit difficult to get started with some inputs. Usually it helps to try again a couple of times (with random seed). Leave out the -seed parameter and try again a few times. On the other hand, on my computer it starts ok with your parameters including -seed 123 so something else is now different in your setup. Check the model file with md5sum and compare with mine in my previous comment. |
Install my pull request #97 and it will fix "function value changing less than tolX" error. Note that when I submitted it it was free of conflicts but does not appear to be the case anymore. |
Hey, I am trying to run the example on Ubuntu, only CPU with
I am using
-tv_weight
because otherwise it's producing only gray images with loss 0 and I saw 149I am getting
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: