Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

"View chimeric alignments in split screen" feature not aligning properly #1572

Open
ryan-moreno opened this issue Sep 19, 2024 · 2 comments
Open
Assignees

Comments

@ryan-moreno
Copy link

In some cases, I believe that the "View chimeric alignments in split screen" feature is zooming to the wrong endpoint on the supplementary read. Here is an example:

chimeric_view_error

In this case, the read maps to both the positive strand of chr6 and the negative strand of chr18. As is shown (correctly) in the "Supplementary Reads Diagram," this means that the read went from "left to right" (in terms of the reference genome) on chr6 and then went from "right to left" on chr18. In this case, I would expect the screen showing chr18 to be centered on the "right" of the read, since this is the position in the read that connects to chr6.

Steps to reproduce:

  • Pull up a bam file in IGV
  • Find a read that maps to two chromosomes and zoom to the main alignment (in this case, the main alignment was on chr6)
  • Right click on the read and select "View chimeric alignments in split screen"

Expected: The screen splits, with each half-screen centered on the position that connects to the other chromosome.

Actual: The screen showing the main alignment correctly centers on the position that connects to the other chromosome, but the screen showing the supplementary alignment centers on the incorrect end of the read.

@jrobinso
Copy link
Contributor

@lbergelson Comments?

@lbergelson
Copy link
Contributor

@ryan-moreno Thanks for pointing this out. It's a good point. I'll update it.

@lbergelson lbergelson self-assigned this Sep 20, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants