-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 244
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Participants & contributors #40
Comments
Looking at the document, this is the definition:
Can you please clarify the cause of confusion? |
For example in the Charter, participants and contributors are used interchangeably, as seen below.
In the Network Strategy doc, there was a definition of Contributor, and we have developed the whole documentation based on the Network Strategy. And we have used participant and contributor interchangeably. You might say "Country Contributor" is totally different from "contributor," but not so much for those in the non-Western world who use different alphabet systems (For example, not many Koreans get the difference between capitalized and non-capitalized words.) What I'm saying is, if these two terms - Country Contributors and Country Participants - are necessary to explain the difference clearly in this document, then let's use them in other documents and also define and use "Participants" in that way (i.e. a collective term for Network Members and Contributors"). Another thought - should we really use the word "country"? I think "Contributors" and "Participants" would suffice, since we can still use just "Contributor" when we are referring to a non-Member who participates in the Chapter. There's not such a thing like a Country Contributor who is not regarded as a Network Contributor, right? Anyway, hope this clarifies... |
Hi Soohyun,
I agree if we can call it chapter.
Cheers
On Fri, 12 Jan 2018 at 10:19 PM, Soohyun Pae ***@***.***> wrote:
For example in the Charter, participants and contributors are used
interchangeably, as seen below.
Joining as a Member or other *participant* means joining a global network
of individuals and organizations that work together, in many different
ways, to promote and enable openness and sharing around the world. We are
all collectively committed to building a global network that is supportive
and that recognises and celebrates the achievements of others. We expect
that as a Member or other *participant*, you will strive to work
collaboratively and help others achieve our shared goals.
In your activities as a Member, many Members will work with others in your
country to constitute a local Chapter, organizing activities consistent and
aligned with the CCGN shared strategic vision. In addition to a local
Chapter’s organizational structure as described above, CCGN Platforms frame
what a Member or other *contributors* can say and do on behalf of
Creative Commons or the local Chapter. Platforms enable diverse and
widespread participation while ensuring that activities of Members and
other *contributors* are strategically aligned and consistent. We welcome
your initiative and creativity in how you contribute to the CCGN and our
shared goals.
In the Network Strategy doc, there was a definition of Contributor, and we
have developed the whole documentation based on the Network Strategy. And
we have used participant and contributor interchangeably. You might say
"Country Contributor" is totally different from "contributor," but not so
much for those in the non-Western world who use different alphabet systems
(For example, not many Koreans get the difference between capitalized and
non-capitalized words.)
What I'm saying is, if these two terms - Country Contributors and Country
Participants - are necessary to explain the difference clearly in this
document, then let's use them in other documents and also define and use
"Participants" in that way (i.e. a collective term for Network Members and
Contributors").
Another thought - should we really use the word "country"? I think
"Contributors" and "Participants" would suffice, since we can still use
just "Contributor" when we are referring to a non-Member who participates
in the Chapter. There's not such a thing like a Country Contributor who is
not regarded as a Network Contributor, right?
And even if we still need another term, I think it's better to use
"Chapter" rather than "Country."
Anyway, hope this clarifies...
—
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#40 (comment)>,
or mute the thread
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AWoHBJxsTWcTy4SWm508G89g8KTcDXBQks5tJ2nwgaJpZM4Rakkb>
.
--
Best Regards,
*Muid Latif*
Creative Analyst, Digital Artist & Designer
Project Lead, Creative Commons Malaysia
http://www.muidlatif.com
Mobile: +6019 2359 610
Channels: Fb <http://www.facebook.com/muidlatif>, Ig
<http://instagram.com/muidlatif>, Twitter <http://www.twitter.com/muidlatif>
*Invest in a creative, free, and open internet. Support Creative Commons
today <https://donate.creativecommons.org/>.*
_
|
I noticed that "participants" and "contributors" are widely used as general terms indicating people who are engaging in the Network but are not necessarily members throughout the whole documentation. But in this particular one, "Chapter Guidelines," they are defined differently and that might potentially cause confusion among people who are familiar with the new structure (especially those from regions where English is not first language).
Maybe we could use the term "contributors" only to refer to non-Members in the other documents to keep consistency for now, @Claudioruiz ?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: