You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Is it also possible to use MethylDacker files output instead of Bismark? https://github.com/dpryan79/MethylDackel
Maybe there is a way that DMRichR-compatible cytosine reports from methyldackel already?
In the Bismark cytosine report file, you have the following columns: "chromosome, position, strand, count methylated, count non-methylated, C-context, trinucleotide context". Methyldackel bedGraph file already contains columns 1, 2, 3 and 4.
Hi @bazyliszek, the cytosine reports are processed by DMRichR::processBismark(), which uses bsseq::read.bismark(). I'm not familiar with MethylDackel, but I'd recommend having a look over the "File formats section" of the bsseq::read.bismark() documentation to learn more. You can always fork DMRichR and modify DMRichR::processBismark().
Is it also possible to use MethylDacker files output instead of Bismark? https://github.com/dpryan79/MethylDackel
Maybe there is a way that DMRichR-compatible cytosine reports from methyldackel already?
In the Bismark cytosine report file, you have the following columns: "chromosome, position, strand, count methylated, count non-methylated, C-context, trinucleotide context". Methyldackel bedGraph file already contains columns 1, 2, 3 and 4.
By the way one of the link is not active in the repro: https://github.com/FelixKrueger/Bismark/tree/master/Docs#optional-genome-wide-cytosine-report-output
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: