You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Describe the bug
iVar variants seem to show some inconsistency between -m 0 (default) and -m 10.
When called with -m 10 it calls a variant that is not called when using -m 0
To Reproduce
samtools mpileup -A -d 0 -Q 0 $BAM | ivar variants -p test0_variants -q 20 -t 0.1 -r $reference_genome
samtools mpileup -A -d 0 -Q 0 $BAM | ivar variants -p test10_variants -q 20 -t 0.1 -m 10 -r $reference_genome
Expected behavior
I may be wrong, but I would expect more PASS calls in the -m 0
Actually, probably this is not correct. I should rather say that I would NOT expect more PASS calls in the -m 10
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Depending on the number of low quality variants, this would be hard to judge. Any chance you could please provide me with a sample file that I can test? Thanks!
Describe the bug
iVar variants seem to show some inconsistency between -m 0 (default) and -m 10.
When called with -m 10 it calls a variant that is not called when using -m 0
To Reproduce
samtools mpileup -A -d 0 -Q 0 $BAM | ivar variants -p test0_variants -q 20 -t 0.1 -r $reference_genome
samtools mpileup -A -d 0 -Q 0 $BAM | ivar variants -p test10_variants -q 20 -t 0.1 -m 10 -r $reference_genome
Expected behavior
I may be wrong, but I would expect more PASS calls in the -m 0
Actually, probably this is not correct. I should rather say that I would NOT expect more PASS calls in the -m 10
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: