You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
The following sentence appears to be a case of clause coordination with an elided verb in the latter two clauses, but the analysis doesn't seem to match with what I can find in the UD guidelines. Is this possibly an annotation error, or am I not understanding things right? (Disclaimer: I have no knowledge of Finnish)
# sent_id = wvlzx-11083.2
# text = Hanna Parviainen maksoi Säynätsalon kirkon 1926 , Walter Ahlström Noormarkun 1929 aloitetun kirkon ja Gösta Serlachius Mäntän kirkon 1928 .
1 Hanna hanna PROPN N,Prop,Sg,Nom Case=Nom|Number=Sing 3 nsubj _ Alt=name
2 Parviainen parviainen PROPN N,Prop,Sg,Nom Case=Nom|Number=Sing 1 flat _ _
3 maksoi maksaa VERB V,Act,Ind,Past,Sg3 Mood=Ind|Number=Sing|Person=3|Tense=Past|VerbForm=Fin|Voice=Act 0 root _ _
4 Säynätsalon säynätsalo PROPN N,Prop,Sg,Gen Case=Gen|Number=Sing 5 nmod _ _
5 kirkon kirkko NOUN N,Sg,Gen Case=Gen|Number=Sing 3 obj _ _
6 1926 1926 NUM Num,Card NumType=Card 3 nmod _ _
7 , , PUNCT Pun _ 6 punct _ _
8 Walter walter PROPN N,Prop,Sg,Nom Case=Nom|Number=Sing 1 conj _ Alt=name
9 Ahlström ahlström PROPN N,Prop,Sg,Nom Case=Nom|Number=Sing 8 flat _ _
10 Noormarkun noormarkku PROPN N,Prop,Sg,Gen Case=Gen|Number=Sing 13 nmod _ _
11 1929 1929 NUM Num,Card NumType=Card 12 nmod _ _
12 aloitetun aloittaa VERB V,Pass,PcpNut,Sg,Gen Case=Gen|Number=Sing|PartForm=Past|VerbForm=Part|Voice=Pass 13 acl _ _
13 kirkon kirkko NOUN N,Sg,Gen Case=Gen|Number=Sing 5 conj _ _
14 ja ja CCONJ Pcle,CC _ 18 cc _ _
15 Gösta gösta PROPN N,Prop,Sg,Nom Case=Nom|Number=Sing 1 conj _ Alt=name
16 Serlachius serlachius PROPN N,Prop,Sg,Nom Case=Nom|Number=Sing 15 flat _ _
17 Mäntän mänttä PROPN N,Prop,Sg,Gen Case=Gen|Number=Sing 18 nmod _ _
18 kirkon kirkko NOUN N,Sg,Gen Case=Gen|Number=Sing 5 conj _ _
19 1928 1928 NUM Num,Card NumType=Card 6 conj _ _
20 . . PUNCT Pun _ 19 punct _ _
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
After looking at this some more, it looks like the annotation is consistent in annotating coordination by connecting pairs of words that are "parallel" to each other.
It is still my impression, though, that the UD guidelines and some of the other Finnish treebanks follow a different convention.
At least the following sentences in the training data appear to be affected by this:
xezs0-6140
r7bh8-8531
xox7g-9207
v125q-11046
ct5yn-11059
wvlzx-11083.2
tpx7s-11098
fzvdh-11101
xz0c3-15094.1
z46wt-15347
yujti-17090
tyszx-6712 (maybe)
And at least the following sentences in the test set:
The following sentence appears to be a case of clause coordination with an elided verb in the latter two clauses, but the analysis doesn't seem to match with what I can find in the UD guidelines. Is this possibly an annotation error, or am I not understanding things right? (Disclaimer: I have no knowledge of Finnish)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: