Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Support Image2DICOM Conversion #384

Open
tostein opened this issue May 13, 2019 · 5 comments
Open

Support Image2DICOM Conversion #384

tostein opened this issue May 13, 2019 · 5 comments

Comments

@tostein
Copy link

tostein commented May 13, 2019

@fedorov As discussed on the NAMIC project week 30, the need of converting non-DICOM image data (ITK formats) into DICOM is present. An example use case are data provided by challenges. We would like to have this functionality in MITK, but if this feature would be included in dcmqi others can profit as well

I think the mechanism of dcmqi (providing meta data as JSON) fits perfect to supply a converter taking the image pixel data and fills out the necessary DICOM tags. In any case, it would be nice to reuse some of the existing code to pursue this goal.

It would be great to have such a converter within the dcmqi library. If this idea finds consent i would be interested to start the development.

@fedorov
Copy link
Member

fedorov commented May 13, 2019

@tostein it would be wonderful to have such functionality in dcmqi, and your contribution is most welcomed!

I think the starting point should be the analysis of this post on the DICOM4QI forum from @dclunie.

Do you want to take a look at that and maybe we could schedule a phone call to discuss the next steps?

@fedorov
Copy link
Member

fedorov commented Jul 19, 2019

@tostein @nolden do you have any thoughts? Is this still of interest to investigate to you?

@nolden
Copy link
Contributor

nolden commented Sep 3, 2019

@fedorov
Copy link
Member

fedorov commented Sep 3, 2019

Per discussion today:

@fedorov
Copy link
Member

fedorov commented Sep 6, 2019

I added some comments to the branch. Overall, it looks consistent with the rest of dcmqi to me, the question is how the next steps will be implemented.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants