What are core elements that most open science projects will tend to need or want?

[xolotl]

From @dwhly on May 5, 2018 1:35

There are things that many science projects, experiments or other collaborations might tend to want or need. We should categorize those and provide leading examples of known solutions in those categories. It's possible there are already good inputs / catalogs that already exist. What are they?

Potential categories might include:

Project management
Collaboration
Issue tracking
Code and data repositories
Manuscript authoring
Publishing
Peer review
Data analysis / Machine learning
Image processing

What are your suggestions?

Copied from original issue: OpenScienceRoadmap/mozilla-sprint-2018#10

[xolotl]

From @Daniel-Mietchen on May 6, 2018 23:51

I guess this one is better discussed over at https://ask-open-science.org/ .

[xolotl]

From @Daniel-Mietchen on May 9, 2018 23:49

Some categories of things that may be worth adding to your list above:

• interfaces with non-open infrastructure and/ or workflows, or components thereof
• community management
• usage stats

Perhaps we should set up a file where we can flesh this out?

[xolotl]

From @Daniel-Mietchen on May 10, 2018 1:13

Acknowledging contributors is another generic need. The all-contributors project seeks to address that at least for GitHub repos. It is used in https://github.com/endangereddataweek/resources .

[xolotl]

From @Daniel-Mietchen on May 10, 2018 19:45

Logos are needed too. Besides our own ticket (#14), there is for instance OpenStories/website#3 for another Mozsprint project.